<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blog Random &#187; Peeves</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blograndom.com/blog/category/peeves/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blograndom.com/blog</link>
	<description>Technology, website development, reviews and how-to's</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 23:50:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Napster web service won&#8217;t steam some songs</title>
		<link>http://www.blograndom.com/blog/2010/06/napster-web-service-wont-steam-some-songs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blograndom.com/blog/2010/06/napster-web-service-wont-steam-some-songs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 19:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cohen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peeves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blograndom.com/blog/?p=343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re using the napster web service and find that random songs stop streaming properly, interrupting your (awesome) playlist, there may be a simple fix:
1. Clear your browser cache
If unsure how to do this, please google &#8220;clear [browser name] cache&#8221;, where browser name is either &#8220;Internet Explorer&#8221;, &#8220;Firefox&#8221;, &#8220;Chrome&#8221;, etc.
2. Clear your flash cache
I didn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re using the napster web service and find that random songs stop streaming properly, interrupting your (awesome) playlist, there may be a simple fix:</p>
<p><strong>1. Clear your browser cache</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">If unsure how to do this, please google &#8220;clear [browser name] cache&#8221;, where browser name is either &#8220;Internet Explorer&#8221;, &#8220;Firefox&#8221;, &#8220;Chrome&#8221;, etc.</p>
<p><strong>2. Clear your flash cache</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">I didn&#8217;t know about this one, but if you browse to the <a href="http://www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/settings_manager07.html">Flash Settings Manager</a> page, you can delete your Flash cache.</p>
<p><strong>3. For good luck, close your browser and re-open it</strong></p>
<p>Seems to have done to trick for me, now I can listen to albums and playlists without playback stopping anymore! Only thing is the issue seems to reproduce itself every now and again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blograndom.com/blog/2010/06/napster-web-service-wont-steam-some-songs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Creative extigy on Mac OS X doesn&#8217;t support 5.1 surround sound</title>
		<link>http://www.blograndom.com/blog/2009/04/creative-extigy-on-mac-os-x-doesnt-support-51-surround/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blograndom.com/blog/2009/04/creative-extigy-on-mac-os-x-doesnt-support-51-surround/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cohen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peeves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blograndom.com/blog/creative-extigy-on-mac-os-x-doesnt-support-51-surround/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I ordered a few cables to get both my PC and powerbook hooked up to my old creative extigy sound card, hoping I could then listen to either through my 5.1 speaker set.
I&#8217;d used the extigy on the mac before, and it certainly does detect it and play sound. Unfortunately I hadn&#8217;t paid much attention [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ordered a few cables to get both my PC and powerbook hooked up to my old creative extigy sound card, hoping I could then listen to either through my 5.1 speaker set.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d used the extigy on the mac before, and it certainly does detect it and play sound. Unfortunately I hadn&#8217;t paid much attention to the rear speakers. It turns out creative never released any drivers for the mac, so not only can I not get proper 5.1 surround sound, the CMSS feature won&#8217;t work either.</p>
<p>So that was a waste of time and money, considering I can get the same sound from a normal stereo cable. Apparently the newer macbooks (hopefully mine included) have optical audio out, but I&#8217;m not sure I want to buy the cable to find out?</p>
<p>As a &#8220;sort of&#8221; fix, I&#8217;m going to play music using parallels running Windows XP. I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m ever going to get away from Windows for good. <img src='http://www.blograndom.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blograndom.com/blog/2009/04/creative-extigy-on-mac-os-x-doesnt-support-51-surround/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online small claims application form: technical error</title>
		<link>http://www.blograndom.com/blog/2009/03/online-small-claims-application-form-technical-error/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blograndom.com/blog/2009/03/online-small-claims-application-form-technical-error/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cohen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peeves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blograndom.com/blog/?p=209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the last few days we&#8217;ve been trying to file a small claim online but everytime we get to the submission stage, we get a technical error and are asked to try again later or file the claim the old-fashioned way!
With the error not dissapearing, I gave them a ring. The first question they asked [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the last few days we&#8217;ve been trying to file a small claim online but everytime we get to the submission stage, we get a technical error and are asked to try again later or file the claim the old-fashioned way!</p>
<p>With the error not dissapearing, I gave them a ring. The first question they asked was, &#8220;<em>what browser are you using?</em>&#8220;. Firefox, of course. Apparently the application form will <strong>only</strong> work in Internet Explorer. A few years ago I would have thought to try this first, but I was under the impression Firefox had enough market share to be taken seriously.</p>
<p>What really annoys me is that there is nothing in this process that <strong>should</strong> require internet explorer to operate properly. Its just a series of simple forms. Its ironic because the government probably paid more for this one form thatn we&#8217;ve ever charged for all forms we&#8217;ve ever built, and it isn&#8217;t even accessible to 30% of the Internet (counting Safari, etc).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blograndom.com/blog/2009/03/online-small-claims-application-form-technical-error/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paypal IPN from the sandbox not working</title>
		<link>http://www.blograndom.com/blog/2008/09/paypal-ipn-from-the-sandbox-not-working/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blograndom.com/blog/2008/09/paypal-ipn-from-the-sandbox-not-working/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 20:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cohen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Googled]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peeves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web dev]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blograndom.com/blog/?p=67</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I spent two hours today trying to figure out why paypal wasn&#8217;t sending any instant payment notifications (IPN) to one of our new projects. Everything seemed right, I had notify_url in the form, the script could be accessed remotely, I had logging on for http and the script itself. After processing a payment I had [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spent two hours today trying to figure out why paypal wasn&#8217;t sending any instant payment notifications (IPN) to one of our new projects. Everything seemed right, I had notify_url in the form, the script could be accessed remotely, I had logging on for http and the script itself. After processing a payment I had 0 requests from the paypal servers hit our development server.</p>
<p>I read around various blogs and discussion forums for obvious problems, of which there are many (see below), but I was sure I had done everything right!</p>
<p>Eventually I stumbled across some posts on the <a href="http://www.paypaldeveloper.com/pdn/board/message?board.id=ipn&amp;thread.id=12053&amp;view=by_date_ascending&amp;page=1">paypal developers forum</a> where a few posters were complaining that the sandbox IPN posts were either really slow (hours) or just never got sent. Worse still, there was one post where paypal acknowledged that payment notifications just did not work on the sandbox for two months!!<span id="more-67"></span></p>
<p>I used the IPN test in the sandbox area to test the script in the end. You have to type in the test values manually and you can&#8217;t test the entire process in one go but at least it got the job done. Needless to say, the single IPN tests work flawlessly. As one final test I used two live paypal accounts to send small payments to each other. IPN worked without a hitch on the live paypal site.</p>
<p>So, if you are stuggling to get IPN working and your logs show that paypal is not posting to your server, maybe this is your problem too. Before you assume it is however, I read of many other common issues that although blatantly obvious, many people (including myself) have often fallen for:</p>
<ol>
<li>I don&#8217;t know why, but some people were using URLs like http://localhost/ipn.php for the notify_url value. Their argument is that it works for the return url. The return URL works as localhost because paypal posts the value in your own browser, which can resolve localhost to the computer you are on. Paypals own servers obviously can&#8217;t!</li>
<li>The ipn processing script was inaccessible (password protected, behind firewalls, etc). Make sure you can access it from outside your local network and that requests from paypal are in your web server logs.</li>
<li>Certain types of escaping for the POST request to paypal can mean that paypal doesn&#8217;t understand the URL.</li>
<li>The IPN processing script erroring before it can log any information. Make sure php/http/whatever logging is enabled for this script &#8211; logging is a god send for cases like this.</li>
</ol>
<p>Hopefully you haven&#8217;t fallen for any of the above and its just paypal being crappy. In any case, I hope this post saves somebody a bit of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blograndom.com/blog/2008/09/paypal-ipn-from-the-sandbox-not-working/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Magnets + macbook pro = bad</title>
		<link>http://www.blograndom.com/blog/2008/09/magnets-macbook-pro-bad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blograndom.com/blog/2008/09/magnets-macbook-pro-bad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cohen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peeves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Truly random]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blograndom.com/blog/?p=63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It may seem obvious to most, in fact, its obvious to me&#8230; but, don&#8217;t leave a magnet resting on your laptop (above the hard drive) while you go to lunch!
I came back from lunch today and the guys in the office were looking at me worriedly. I asked why and they went on to explain [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may seem obvious to most, in fact, its obvious to me&#8230; but, don&#8217;t leave a magnet resting on your laptop (above the hard drive) while you go to lunch!</p>
<p>I came back from lunch today and the guys in the office were looking at me worriedly. I asked why and they went on to explain that while I was away my laptop began to make loud clicking noises. They soon realised it was the magnet and moved it away but it seems all too late.</p>
<p><em>Why did I put a magnet on my laptop?</em> I have a couple of those twizzly gadget magnets and I was fiddling with them while I tested out the paypal sandbox (see next post). I decided to go get some lunch and without thinking just popped them on my desk/laptop. Same thing? No.</p>
<p>Plus I hadn&#8217;t backed up my photos in a month (all work related stuff gets backed up anyway) so lost all my pictures of Rome and the trip through France. Bummer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blograndom.com/blog/2008/09/magnets-macbook-pro-bad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Http spam?!</title>
		<link>http://www.blograndom.com/blog/2008/09/http-spam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blograndom.com/blog/2008/09/http-spam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 22:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cohen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Googled]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peeves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blograndom.com/blog/?p=53</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the last few days I&#8217;ve had thousands of requests from a small number of IP addresses. My bandwidth usage had doubled and when I logged on to find out why, I was dissapointed to find it wasn&#8217;t a huge surge in new visitors! :p
I&#8217;ve since blocked the IP&#8217;s in question but, is this common? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the last few days I&#8217;ve had thousands of requests from a small number of IP addresses. My bandwidth usage had doubled and when I logged on to find out why, I was dissapointed to find it wasn&#8217;t a huge surge in new visitors! :p</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve since blocked the IP&#8217;s in question but, is this common? The main culprit was 78.108.81.41 but not a lot comes up in a search on google for it. The IP resolves to a russian website that looks like it could be a web host or a portal, nothing that looks suspect anyway! Very strange.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blograndom.com/blog/2008/09/http-spam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Woods appointments don&#8217;t deliver</title>
		<link>http://www.blograndom.com/blog/2008/06/woods-appointments-dont-deliver/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blograndom.com/blog/2008/06/woods-appointments-dont-deliver/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cohen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Googled]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peeves]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blograndom.com/blog/?p=51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t like to name and shame companies and I hardly ever do it, but I&#8217;d hate to see anybody else potentially lose money by purchasing leads from Woods appointments without seriously considering whether you may end up in the same position as our company.
My business partner was phoned a few months back and asked [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like to name and shame companies and I hardly ever do it, but I&#8217;d hate to see anybody else potentially lose money by purchasing leads from Woods appointments without seriously considering whether you may end up in the same position as our company.</p>
<p>My business partner was phoned a few months back and asked if we would like to purchase some &#8216;meeting leads&#8217; in the local area. Woods appointments would be in charge of calling up and arranging meetings on our behalf and we would pay something like £25 a lead. It sounded worth a shot and we purchased the minimum of I think 5 leads. I&#8217;m not at the office now and forget the exact amounts but I know we paid £140 via google checkout.</p>
<p>£140 isn&#8217;t a lot, and we weren&#8217;t expecting much, if anything, to come of the leads&#8230; but we were expecting some leads or some contact from Woods appointments at the very least. Having sent payment we haven&#8217;t heard anything back from Woods appointments, they seem to have disappeared.</p>
<p>The payment was over 90 days ago meaning Google checkout won&#8217;t mediate the payment. They suggest we get mastercard to do a charge back, which of course we will. I&#8217;m not completely surprised this has happened but it is a shame we&#8217;ve had to deal with the hassle of requesting our money back.</p>
<p>If I hear from Woods appointments and they have a reasonable explanation I will without hesitation revoke my comments. Until then I hope this warns at least one other person of the risks of dealing with Woods appointments. We have a phone number from a Google checkout invoice that may be worth trying if anyone else is in the same boat, just drop me an email.</p>
<p>P.S. I didn&#8217;t see the website until after this little debacle but it should have been obvious not to trust a company that has a website with the title &#8216;Untitled document&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blograndom.com/blog/2008/06/woods-appointments-dont-deliver/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Radio times website is always down</title>
		<link>http://www.blograndom.com/blog/2008/01/radio-times-website-is-always-down/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blograndom.com/blog/2008/01/radio-times-website-is-always-down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 22:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cohen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peeves]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blograndom.com/blog/radio-times-website-is-always-down/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ll often check out the radio times website to see what is currently on TV if I get some spare time. I&#8217;ve noticed that 1/5 times I go to the site, it is completely down and it is often very slow to load.
I imagine the site could be quite busy but surely a site that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll often check out the <a href="http://www.radiotimes.com/">radio times website</a> to see what is currently on TV if I get some spare time. I&#8217;ve noticed that 1/5 times I go to the site, it is completely down and it is often very slow to load.</p>
<p>I imagine the site could be quite busy but surely a site that popular (and with a decent budget I&#8217;d imagine) must be able to sort out some decent hosting for their website?!</p>
<p>I wonder how it is hosted.. possibly in-house?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blograndom.com/blog/2008/01/radio-times-website-is-always-down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome Internet Explorer 6 users!</title>
		<link>http://www.blograndom.com/blog/2007/12/welcome-internet-explorer-6-users/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blograndom.com/blog/2007/12/welcome-internet-explorer-6-users/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cohen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peeves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web dev]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blograndom.com/blog/welcome-internet-explorer-6-users/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When designing and coding the template for this blog I didn&#8217;t have access to IE6 (thanks MS), but I finally got hold of Virtual PC and managed to sort out a number of issues that made it look worse than it is supposed to be!
Unfortunately there are still many people using IE6, at least 15% [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When designing and coding the template for this blog I didn&#8217;t have access to IE6 (thanks MS), but I finally got hold of Virtual PC and managed to sort out a number of issues that made it look worse than it is supposed to be!</p>
<p>Unfortunately there are still many people using IE6, at least 15% of visitors to this site and a lot more to other sites that have a less technical audience. Luckily that number is falling day-by-day and hopefully soon we can all stop wasting time making exceptions for IE6. I&#8217;ve found there are far fewer issues with IE7, hopefully it will stay that way in future versions.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d apologise to IE6 users but I think its about time they upgraded! :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blograndom.com/blog/2007/12/welcome-internet-explorer-6-users/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
